# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `BORE` with significantly higher average FPS compared to other runs. * **Smoothest FPS**: `Rustland` with the lowest standard deviation and variance in FPS. * **Best overall**: `BORE` offering the highest performance with relatively minimal variance in FPS compared to others. # Issues: * The `LAVD` configuration recorded a noticeably lower average FPS, approximately 10% less, compared to all other tested configurations, indicating potential performance constraints or inefficiencies specific to this setup despite using identical hardware and software configurations. # Summary This benchmarking analysis compares the `BORE` and various `sched_ext` schedulers in the context of gaming performance in "Rocket League" on a consistent hardware and software basis. The `BORE` configuration showcases the highest average frame rates, making it the best choice for maximum performance. Meanwhile, configurations such as `Rustland` provide stable and smooth frame rates, indicative of a focus on consistency over sheer speed. `LAVD` exhibits notably reduced performance, underscoring potential inefficiencies that may need addressing in its scheduler implementation. Overall, these results provide insights into how different Linux kernel schedulers impact gaming performance, with some optimizing for peak performance and others for smoothness and stability.