# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `Bpfland-main` with approximately 8% higher average FPS compared to others, leading the performance. * **Smoothest FPS**: `Bpfland-next` has the lowest standard deviation and variance by a slight margin, offering the smoothest experience. * **Best overall**: `Bpfland-next -m performance` balances both high FPS and a smooth output, making it the best overall choice despite having a marginally higher variability. # Issues: * The mean FPS for the second runtime was approximately 8% lower than the best-performing run. While the hardware and software environments remain consistent, adjustments should be considered to close this performance gap. # Summary: In this benchmark, different configurations of the `bfpland` scheduler in Rocket League are compared using a consistent hardware and software environment. The `Bpfland-main` configuration achieved the highest frame rates, showcasing its superior performance potential. However, the `Bpfland-next -m performance` configuration provided a balanced approach with slightly better overall deliverability due to its balance of high FPS and minimal frame time variation. While the second runtime lagged in terms of frame rate, it offered the smoothest gameplay owing to its stability. Nevertheless, improvements can be made to optimize the performance further, providing a consistently seamless gaming experience.