# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `BPFLAND --slice-us 1000` and it provided the highest average frames per second with a commendable FPS stability. * **Smoothest FPS**: `BPFLAND --slice-us 1000` and it showed the lowest standard deviation in FPS, indicating the most stable frame rate. * **Best overall**: `BPFLAND --slice-us 1000` and it offered the best balance of high FPS and smooth performance. # Issues: * The `BPFLAND Next` run demonstrated significantly lower FPS, with an average performance decrease of approximately 7% compared to other benchmarks. Despite being part of the performance comparison, it also showed significantly higher FPS variance, suggesting instability during the run. # Summary This benchmark compares different configurations of the `BPFLAND` scheduler family on a uniform hardware setup of `AMD` Ryzen and Radeon GPU platform. With the `-slice-us 1000` option, this scheduler variant excelled in terms of both FPS and frame consistency, outperforming the `BPFLAND` and `BPFLAND Next` configurations. While the `BPFLAND` provided commendable performance with high FPS, the `BPFLAND Next` variant underperformed by showcasing lower FPS along with a higher variability in frame times. These observations point towards potential optimizations or discrepancies in the `BPFLAND Next` configuration that affect its real-time performance capabilities.