# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `EEVDF` with approximately 97% higher mean FPS compared to the run with the lowest mean FPS. * **Smoothest FPS**: `EEVDF` with the lowest standard deviation of FPS, indicating more consistent frame timing compared to others. * **Best overall**: `EEVDF` as it offers the highest FPS and smoothest experience, making it the best choice overall. # Issues: * Among the compared runs, the configuration utilizing `EEVDF` scheduler significantly outperforms all others in terms of FPS and smoothness. * The configuration using `SCX LAVD` scheduler exhibits notably reduced performance, around 74% decrease in FPS relative to the highest performing configuration. * The configuration using `SCX bpfland` scheduler has issues with the lowest FPS, showing approximately 78% lower mean FPS compared to the best-performing configuration. # Summary This benchmark compares different schedulers, specifically `EEVDF` and several `SCX` schedulers, in a gaming and kernel compilation scenario. Utilizing the `EEVDF` scheduler resulted in the highest and most consistent FPS performance, significantly surpassing all `SCX` schedulers such as `LAVD` and `bpfland`, which lagged in terms of overall and smooth gaming experience. Given equal hardware, except for the scheduler differences, it appears that `EEVDF` is the superior choice for maximizing gaming performance under these conditions.