# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `BPFLAND -m all -w` with approximately 5% higher average FPS compared to others. * **Smoothest FPS**: `Patched LAVD --performance --slice-max-us 1000` with the lowest standard deviation and variance in FPS. * **Best overall**: `BPFLAND -m all -w --slice-us 1000` with performance slightly lower than the highest FPS run but significantly more stable and smoother. # Issues: * The patched `LAVD --performance` scheduler demonstrated approximately 7% lower average FPS than the top-performing scheduler implementations. This indicates inefficiency in handling the CPU-limited scenario. * Another run, `BORE`, exhibited around 3% lower FPS and higher frame time variability compared to the top-performing runs, indicating a drop in performance and smoothness. # Summary This benchmark compares various `SCX` scheduler implementations against the `BORE` scheduler and highlights significant differences in performance during a CPU-limited scenario in Elden Ring. The `BPFLAND -m all -w` scheduler excelled, offering the highest FPS, whereas `BPFLAND -m all -w --slice-us 1000` provided the most balanced performance profile, combining both high FPS and smoothness. The `LAVD` related patched configurations showed improvements but still lagged behind in FPS, indicating room for optimizations. These insights help depict how different schedulers can affect game performance, particularly in demanding scenes like Gatefront Ruins.