# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `BORE` with highest average FPS, significantly higher than other runs, indicating this setup offered superior overall performance. * **Smoothest FPS**: `Patched LAVD` exhibited the lowest standard deviation, providing the most consistent frame times amongst all runs. * **Best overall**: `BORE` achieved the best balance of high average FPS and reasonable stability, making it the best choice overall for this benchmarking test. # Issues: * The frame rate in the `BPFLAND -m all`, `FLASH -m all`, `Patched LAVD`, and `Patched LAVD --performance` configurations were significantly lower, around 10% to 15% below the higher-performing configurations. * `FLASH -m all` and `Patched LAVD --performance` exhibited a standard deviation in FPS that could indicate more inconsistency in performance compared to others, diminishing the experience with noticeable frame dips. * The CPU and GPU temperatures remained consistent across all benchmarks, showing no signs of thermal throttling impacting any specific configuration. This suggests the issue lies primarily with FPS performance. * Performance drops in certain configurations did not correlate with any change in hardware or software, indicating the intrinsic performance of the scheduler settings. # Summary This comparison evaluated the performance of different scheduler implementations in a CPU-limited, static scene within the game "Clone Drone in the Danger Zone", focusing on `BORE`, `BPFLAND -m all`, `FLASH -m all`, `P2DQ`, and `Patched LAVD` configurations, among others. The key focus was on maintaining high FPS and consistent frame times to ensure smooth gameplay. While `BORE` showcased superior FPS and `Patched LAVD` offered the most stable frame times, other configurations like `BPFLAND -m all` and `FLASH -m all` faltered in both categories, suggesting a lack of optimization for peak performance. Despite using a consistent hardware and software environment, certain scheduler configurations did not fully leverage the system's capabilities, highlighting the impact of scheduler choice on gaming experience.