# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `FLASH -m all` achieved the highest average FPS, indicating an excellent performance in maintaining frame rates. * **Smoothest FPS**: `FLASH -m all -w` exhibited the lowest standard deviation in FPS, showing the smoothest frame rate during the benchmarking. * **Best overall**: `FLASH -m all` and `FLASH -m all -w` together offered a combination of high FPS and smooth frame delivery, compared to the others. However, `FLASH -m all` slightly outperformed in terms of FPS. # Issues: * The `LAVD` run had the lowest FPS, approximately 7% lower than the average of the other runs, indicating a potential issue with FPS performance in this configuration. * `LAVD` runs had higher Frame time variance by more than 6%, suggesting more inconsistency in frame times when compared to others. # Summary This benchmark compares the performance of different schedulers (`BORE`, `BPFLAND`, `FLASH`, `LAVD`, `P2DQ`) on a system with an AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE GPU and an AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D CPU. The `FLASH` scheduler variations provided the highest FPS and smoothest overall experience among the runs. In contrast, the `LAVD` scheduler showed lower performance, both in FPS and stability. Overall, the benchmarking highlights the effectiveness and performance variability across different scheduler implementations in a consistent testing environment using the same hardware and software settings.