# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `FLASH -m all`, achieving a mean FPS approximately 5% higher than other runs. * **Smoothest FPS**: `FLASH Next -m all -w --tickless`, with a standard deviation that is roughly 30% lower than others, indicating more stable performance. * **Best overall**: `FLASH Next -m all -w --tickless` balances a reasonable FPS with very smooth frame rates, providing the optimal experience among the datasets. # Issues: None of the runs presented clear issues that significantly set one apart as particularly problematic. The benchmarks were executed under the same hardware and software conditions, and the performance was consistent with expected variations. # Summary This benchmark primarily compares the performance of different configurations across `BORE` and `sched_ext` setups on a consistent hardware and software environment, using a custom map with NPCs. The data indicate that employing `FLASH -m all` configuration yields the highest average FPS, while `FLASH Next -m all -w --tickless` offers the smoothest performance with lower variability. The `FLASH -m all -w` with tickless configuration stands out for achieving a good balance, providing an overall superior experience with both high and consistent frame rates. These runs illustrate the capacity of `sched_ext` in facilitating performance optimization through advanced scheduling strategies, though each setup offers its unique advantages within specific performance characteristics.