Benchmark #1536

Download
Teardown | BORE vs SCX

CPU Limited scene from a custom map with NPCs, no background load. 30 second frame recording with 0ms interval. Performance Governor/EPP | main commit: 419ade7 -next: 5d43ead

Submitted 4 days ago by summedkibbles36

Specifications
Label OS GPU CPU RAM OS specific
FLASH -m all -w Freedesktop SDK 24.08 (Flatpak runtime) AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE (RADV NAVI31) AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D 8-Core Processor 33 GB 6.15.3-cachyos2.lto.fc43.x86_64 performance
FLASH Next -m all -w Freedesktop SDK 24.08 (Flatpak runtime) AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE (RADV NAVI31) AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D 8-Core Processor 33 GB 6.15.3-cachyos2.lto.fc43.x86_64 performance
FLASH Next -m all -w --tickless Freedesktop SDK 24.08 (Flatpak runtime) AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE (RADV NAVI31) AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D 8-Core Processor 33 GB 6.15.3-cachyos2.lto.fc43.x86_64 performance
# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `FLASH -m all -w` with approximately 0.4% higher FPS compared to the others. * **Smoothest FPS**: `FLASH Next -m all -w` with the lowest standard deviation and variance among the three runs. * **Best overall**: `FLASH Next -m all -w` for having the smoothest FPS while maintaining competitive average FPS. # Summary This benchmark compares performance using the same hardware on three different configurations in a CPU-limited scene from a custom map with NPCs. All tests were performed on an AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D CPU, AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE GPU, and Freedesktop SDK 24.08 as the operating system. The main difference lies in the use of the `FLASH` configurations and a variation with `--tickless` for one run. The best overall results indicate that the configuration using `FLASH Next -m all -w` without `--tickless` delivers a highly stable performance, combining both smoothness and competitive FPS, making it the most suitable option for this particular workload scenario.