# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `FLASH Next -m all -w`, achieving a significantly higher frame rate compared to other configurations. * **Smoothest FPS**: `Flash Next -m all -w -p` with the lowest standard deviation and variance of frame rate, indicating consistent performance. * **Best overall**: `FLASH Next -m all -w`; despite a slightly higher variability compared to the smoothest run, it maintains the highest performance levels within negligible instability. # Issues: * The setup using the third version of the configuration exhibits notably lower average FPS (approximately 17% lower) and is significantly less stable with the highest variance, suggesting potential issues with this particular configuration. * The first configuration tested, while consistent, shows about a 10% lower performance compared to the top performers, indicating room for improvement in its optimization. # Summary This benchmark evaluated various configurations running under `BORE` and `SCX` environments while managing additional background loads. Across the board, the `SCX` configurations outperformed `BORE`, with `FLASH Next -m all -w` leading in overall performance and stability, suggesting efficacy in handling complex AI-heavy scenes within a GPU-limited situation. However, an earlier version of the `SCX` setup displays significantly reduced performance, highlighting potential regressions or inefficiencies in its latest updates.