Benchmark #1566

Download
Elden Ring | BORE vs Flash Next

GPU Limited scene (not saturated) in Gatefront Ruins (AI heavy) with no background load. 30 second frame recording with 0ms interval. Performance Governor/EPP. Tested commit: fd59d56 | Shared Flash Flags: -m all -C 0 -c 0 --slice-us 300 --slice-us-min 300

Submitted 3 weeks ago by summedkibbles36

Specifications
Label OS GPU CPU RAM OS specific
BORE Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE (RADV NAVI31) AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D 8-Core Processor 33 GB 6.15.4-cachyos1.lto.fc43.x86_64 performance
Flash Next Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE (RADV NAVI31) AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D 8-Core Processor 33 GB 6.15.4-cachyos1.lto.fc43.x86_64 performance
Flash Next -p Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE (RADV NAVI31) AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D 8-Core Processor 33 GB 6.15.4-cachyos1.lto.fc43.x86_64 performance
Flash Next -w Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE (RADV NAVI31) AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D 8-Core Processor 33 GB 6.15.4-cachyos1.lto.fc43.x86_64 performance
Flash Next -w -p Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE (RADV NAVI31) AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D 8-Core Processor 33 GB 6.15.4-cachyos1.lto.fc43.x86_64 performance
# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `Flash Next -w -p` has the highest average FPS, approximately 3% higher than the average FPS of other runs. * **Smoothest FPS**: `Flash Next -w` has the lowest standard deviation and variance, indicating the most consistent FPS with about 20% less variability than the smoothness of other runs. * **Best overall**: `Flash Next -p` strikes a good balance, offering high FPS while maintaining smoothness with 2% better consistency than the overall average, which makes it a strong contender for best overall performance. # Summary This benchmark compares the performance of different iterations of the `Flash` graphics mode against `BORE` in the context of Elden Ring, using identical hardware and software settings. The `Flash Next -w -p` version achieved the highest FPS, displaying a 3% improvement over other modes. However, the `Flash Next` configuration with slightly adjusted parameters delivered the smoothest playback experience with 20% less variability in FPS. Collectively, these comparisons show how minor tweaks in `Flash Next` configurations lead to differences in performance, aiding in determining the optimal setup for both performance and stability.