# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `LAVD` with an average FPS that's marginally higher than the other runs, ensuring smoother gameplay. * **Smoothest FPS**: `LAVD Lat Crit` has the lowest standard deviation and variance in FPS, indicating a more consistent frame delivery. * **Best overall**: `LAVD Lat Crit` is the most stable option with comparable FPS, providing the best balance of performance and stability. # Issues: * The `LAVD --performance` configuration showed decreased FPS, with a mean lower than others by a significant margin. The variance in FPS was also larger compared to other runs, indicating less consistency in frame times. * The GPU core clock in the `LAVD --performance` run also displayed a higher variance compared to others, possibly contributing to the less consistent performance. # Summary The benchmark compares the standard `LAVD` configuration with a latency-critical variant and their respective performance scheduler settings. The standard `LAVD` provides a slightly higher average FPS, while the `LAVD Lat Crit` configuration offers the greatest frame time stability across the tests. The run solely labeled as `LAVD --performance` showed lower and more volatile FPS, which makes it less suitable for optimal gameplay experience. This evaluation suggests that while both `LAVD` and `LAVD Lat Crit` configurations provide commendable performance, `LAVD Lat Crit` strikes a better balance in stability, making it the preferable choice for performance and consistency.