# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `BORE 5.9.6 3⁄3` with a mean FPS approximately 0.05% higher than the other runs * **Smoothest FPS**: `BORE 5.9.6 2⁄3` with the lowest standard deviation and variance in FPS, roughly 2% smoother than other runs * **Best overall**: `BORE 5.9.6 2⁄3` as it offers a good balance of highest average FPS and the smoothest experience among all runs, with peak stability # Issues: * The run labeled `BORE 6.0.0-beta3 3⁄3` showed a significantly lower FPS averaging around 2% lower than others, with increased variability. # Summary This benchmark analysis of Rocket League using the BORE 5.9.6, BORE 6.0.0-beta3, and the EEVDF focuses primarily on performance using similar hardware and software setups. The BORE 5.9.6 series slightly outperforms others in terms of FPS with `performance` Linux scheduler, showcasing about 2% higher performance than the BORE 6.0.0-beta3 kernel version. Consequently, updated kernel version seems to have an adverse impact, as evident by lower FPS outcomes underlining noteworthy declines in seamless gameplay. Meanwhile, EEVDF yields comparable results with BORE 6.0.0-beta3, though still lagging behind BORE 5.9.6, revealing insights into how significant small kernel and driver changes can be for demanding applications like gaming.