# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `p2dq --deadline` with roughly a 0.7% higher FPS compared to the next best. * **Smoothest FPS**: `LAVD` due to the lowest standard deviation and variance in FPS, indicating more consistent frame delivery. * **Best overall**: `Bpfland` offering a good balance of high FPS and relatively stable frame times, exhibiting a stability to FPS rate that is competitive with the more consistent runs. # Issues: * The scheduler using the `LAVD` configuration has approximately 3% lower FPS than the others, while maintaining a slightly more stable FPS. However, the significant drop in FPS might not justify the stability gain. # Summary In this benchmark comparing the `BORE` and `SCX` schedulers while running a Rocket League match replay with `SMT OFF`, various schedulers were tested on identical hardware and software settings. The results indicate that the `p2dq --deadline` scheduler provides the highest frames per second, while the `LAVD` scheduler delivers the most consistent frame intervals despite a lower FPS. Overall, `Bpfland` shows a promising balance between performance and frame time stability, making it a reliable choice for achieving competitive gaming performance during this type of workload.