# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `FSync 1` - Delivers the highest average frame rate and maintains strong performance throughout the benchmark. * **Smoothest FPS**: `NTSync 1` - Exhibits the lowest standard deviation in FPS, indicating the most stable and consistent frame delivery. * **Best overall**: `FSync 1` - Offers a combination of the highest FPS and a relatively low variance, making it a balanced choice between performance and stability. # Issues: * The `NTSync` runs demonstrate significantly lower FPS compared to the `FSync` runs. This suggests that the `NTSync` configuration might not be as optimized for performance in this scenario as the `FSync` setup. # Summary In this benchmark comparing the performance of `FSync` and `NTSync` under a CPU-limited scenario with a background load, the `FSync` configuration outperforms `NTSync` in terms of both average FPS and stability. While `FSync` delivers better overall and highest FPS performance, the `NTSync` runs, although smoother, fall short in terms of raw performance. This suggests `FSync` might be better suited for scenarios prioritizing high frame rates, while `NTSync` could be chosen for its smoother frame delivery in less performance-critical setups. Both configurations utilized the same hardware and software environments, ensuring a fair comparison between `FSync` and `NTSync` under these specific conditions.