# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `Fsync` - This run achieved the highest average FPS, approximately 17% more than the next highest, providing the best raw performance. * **Smoothest FPS**: `NTSync` - With the lowest standard deviation and variance in FPS, this run maintained the most consistent frame rate. * **Best overall**: `Fsync` - Despite having a higher standard deviation than `NTSync`, the significant increase in FPS makes this run the most advantageous overall. # Summary In this benchmark, different synchronization techniques (`NTSync`, `Fsync`, `Esync`) were tested in a CPU limited scenario with consistent hardware configurations. The `Fsync` method delivered the highest average FPS, thus showcasing the best performance, albeit with slightly less smoothness than `NTSync`. However, `NTSync` provided the smoothest experience with the lowest variance in FPS. Meanwhile, the `Esync` configuration, while stable, lagged behind in performance compared to the others. All tests were conducted under the same conditions, utilizing the `BORE` scheduler under `kernel-cachyos-lto-6.15.7`.