Top runs

• Highest FPS: BORE powersave with an average FPS approximately 3% higher than the others.
• Smoothest FPS: LAVD powersave with a standard deviation of FPS approximately 11% lower than the next smoothest run.
• Best overall: BORE powersave due to its significantly higher FPS with a standard deviation only slightly higher (approximately 5%) than the smoothest run.

Issues

• LAVD powersave: This run is significantly worse than the others, with an average FPS around 5% lower and inconsistency shown by a lower FPS value (with the lowest FPS roughly 60% lower).

Summary

All runs used the same hardware and software, with the same Linux kernel, and scheduler, ensuring consistency in the benchmarking environment. BORE powersave stands out with the highest FPS, while LAVD powersave has the smoothest FPS but an unacceptable performance drop compared to other runs. LAVD powersave also has a stability issue, with an average FPS roughly 5% lower than other runs, suggesting a problem in performance settings potentially linked to the Linux scheduler in this specific scenario. Other runs (ASDF powersave, Bpfland powersave, Rusty powersave) demonstrate similar performance patterns, making them reliable but not remarkable in this benchmark.