## Top runs - **Highest FPS**: `BORE performance` with FPS approximately 5% higher than the next best run. - **Smoothest FPS**: `LAVD performance` with the lowest standard deviation and variance in FPS. - **Best overall**: `BORE performance` due to having significantly higher FPS with only a marginally higher variance compared to the `LAVD performance` run. ## Issues - **`LAVD performance`** has significantly lower FPS, approximately 4% lower than the next lowest run (`ASDF performance`). Considering all five runs use identical hardware, software (OS, GPU, CPU, RAM), and Linux scheduler (`performance`), this could indicate an issue with the `LAVD performance` run itself. ## Summary The benchmarks show that `BORE performance` stands out with the highest average FPS, approximately 5% better than others, while maintaining acceptable stability. `LAVD performance` offers the smoothest gameplay experience with the lowest variance in FPS, yet it suffers from lower FPS, which is concerning given the identical hardware and software configurations. The `Rusty performance`, `BPFLAND performance`, and `ASDF performance` runs fall in the middle, offering reasonably high FPS with slight differences in smoothness and stability. Overall, the runs are similar except for `LAVD performance`, which shows an unusual drop in FPS, indicating a potential issue that may need further investigation.