# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `scx_lavd --performance --per-cpu-dsq` with approximately 1% higher mean FPS compared to others. * **Smoothest FPS**: `scx_lavd --performance --per-cpu-dsq --slice-max-us 500` with about 7% lower standard deviation. * **Best overall**: `scx_lavd --performance --per-cpu-dsq --slice-max-us 500` due to a good balance of high FPS and smooth frame times. # Issues: * The configurations `scx_lavd --performance --per-cpu-dsq` and `scx_lavd --performance --per-cpu-dsq --slice-max-us 500` show significantly higher VRAM and swap usage, which could impact performance if approaching limits or under higher load conditions. # Summary In this benchmark, variations of the `scx_lavd` scheduler with different flags and `--slice-max-us 500` showed notable differences in performance. The `--performance --per-cpu-dsq` configuration provided the highest average FPS, indicating its capability for peak performance. However, the addition of `--slice-max-us 500` demonstrated smoother FPS and overall performance, balancing frame consistency and high FPS. Both configurations had similar operating conditions and hardware specifications; however, VRAM and swap usage differed, which can affect the system under certain circumstances.