### Top runs - **Highest FPS**: `LAVD performance` with the highest average FPS. - **Smoothest FPS**: `LAVD balanced --no-core-compaction` with the lowest standard deviation in FPS. - **Best overall**: `LAVD performance` due to having the highest FPS with a relatively low standard deviation compared to other runs. ### Issues - **`LAVD balanced --no-core-compaction`**: Has significantly lower average FPS compared to the other runs, around 15-20% below the rest, indicating a performance issue. ### Summary All the runs used identical hardware and software, providing a level playing field for comparison. The `LAVD performance` run outperformed others in terms of FPS, showing a noticeable 15-20% FPS increase compared to the rest, making it the best overall despite its slightly higher variability. `LAVD balanced --no-core-compaction` had the lowest performance, around 15-20% lower FPS than other runs, suggesting an issue with this configuration. For smoothness, `LAVD balanced --no-core-compaction` showed the lowest variance, making it the most stable in terms of FPS. This benchmark indicates that for achieving the highest FPS, the `LAVD performance` configuration is recommended, while the `LAVD balanced --no-core-compaction` configuration needs further inspection due to its significantly lower performance.