# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `scx_cosmos -m all -c 0 -p 0` with approximately 40% higher mean FPS than the lowest performing run, showcasing exceptional frame rate performance. * **Smoothest FPS**: `scx_lavd --performance`, which exhibits the lowest standard deviation of FPS among all runs, indicating superior stability with around 70% less variability compared to the most variable run. * **Best overall**: `scx_cosmos -m all -c 0 -p 0`, offering a balanced performance of very high FPS and relatively smooth frame time, though not the lowest variation, it was accompanied by strong FPS improvements. # Issues: * The BORE configuration experiences roughly 30% lower mean FPS compared to the highest FPS run, likely indicating a performance disadvantage within the specific setup or configuration compared to others in the GPU-limited benchmark. # Summary This benchmark was designed to evaluate the performance differences between the traditional `BORE` configuration and various `sched_ext (scx)` schedulers, using a GPU-limited scenario at 1080p with software encoding. All runs shared the same core hardware setup and Linux environment, but varied in the scheduler used. It was evident that the different `scx` implementations generally outperformed `BORE`, with `scx_cosmos` emerging as a top choice due to its high FPS and acceptable stability. On the other hand, `BORE` noticeably lagged behind in FPS performance, highlighting its limitations in this context. The results suggest that certain `scx` configurations can offer superior performance for gaming under similar conditions.