# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `Main 2` with the highest average FPS, marginally outperforming others by a small percentage. * **Smoothest FPS**: `Next 2` with the lowest standard deviation and variance in FPS, indicating more consistent frame rates. * **Best overall**: `Next 1` as it balances high FPS with a relatively smooth experience, making it an optimal choice for both performance and stability. # Issues: * The comparisons between the main and next versions show consistent hardware and software across the board, indicating no discrepancies in configuration that could be affecting the performance. All configurations are under similar setups without significant FPS issues. # Summary This benchmark comparison between the BPFLAND and BPFLAND-NEXT versions focused on the performance in Halo Reach using the AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE and AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D. Both versions operated under similar conditions with consistent hardware and the Linux `performance` governor. The goal was to evaluate the enhancements in frame rates and smoothness offered by the `next` version. While the `next` version demonstrated marginal improvements in smoothness, the main version exhibited a slightly higher FPS. Overall, both implementations deliver comparable experiences with minor differences, making them both suitable depending on specific user preferences for stability versus peak performance.