# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `Main -m all -c 0 -p 0 | 2` with a marginally higher mean FPS compared to the rest. * **Smoothest FPS**: `Main -m all -c 0 -p 0 | 2` due to the lowest variance and standard deviation of FPS. * **Best overall**: `Main -m all -c 0 -p 0 | 2` strikes a balance between high FPS and smooth performance. # Issues: * The "COSMOS-NEXT" runs consistently have 6-7% lower FPS than the "COSMOS" runs, indicating a performance regression or inefficiency. * "COSMOS-NEXT" runs utilize a slightly higher GPU VRAM and slightly different GPU temperatures among the group, which isn't a core part of this comparison but worth noting. # Summary: This benchmark analysis compares two different branches of the scheduler from this Ubuntu-based gaming setup, examining "COSMOS" versus "COSMOS-NEXT" on the Steam Runtime. Both are assessed based on FPS stability and performance using an AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE GPU. The "COSMOS" branch consistently outperforms "COSMOS-NEXT" in terms of FPS. In addition to having higher FPS, "COSMOS" also demonstrates a smoother performance across all metrics. While all test conditions, apart from the branch under test, remain constant, the notable performance difference suggests that "COSMOS-NEXT" may need further optimization.