# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `Next --no-sticky-tasks 3` and this run achieved the highest average FPS, with over a 0.1% increase compared to the majority of other runs. * **Smoothest FPS**: `Next 2` and this run demonstrated the lowest frame time variance and standard deviation, making it the smoothest run. * **Best overall**: `Next 2` with a balance of high average FPS and smooth frame time, it provides optimal consistency and performance. # Issues: * The run labeled as `Prev Next 1` showed a performance decrease in terms of FPS, with about 0.1% lower than most of the higher-performing runs and higher FPS variability compared to others. * Compared to the top-performing runs, the run labeled as `Next --no-sticky-tasks 2` displayed a slight reduction in frame rate stability along with a marginal drop in average FPS. # Summary This benchmark evaluates the performance differences in a GPU limited static scene using variations of the `BPFLAND` scheduler configurations. The configurations included both transitioning and non-sticky task handling. The run using `BPFLAND-NEXT` with no sticky tasks showcased the highest FPS performance. Meanwhile, the same `BPFLAND-NEXT` configuration demonstrated optimal frame time smoothness, highlighting its advantageous stability. Overall, while all configurations run with identical hardware and minimal environmental changes besides scheduler configurations, marginal variations in FPS and consistency were observed favoring the `BPFLAND-NEXT` with default and no-sticky-task setups.