# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `scx_bpfland -w` with approximately 6% higher average FPS compared to the rest of the runs. * **Smoothest FPS**: `scx_bpfland -w` with approximately 20% lower FPS variance, indicating better smoothness and more stable performance. * **Best overall**: `scx_bpfland -w` due to the combination of highest average FPS and smoothest frame consistency, making it superior for both performance and stability. # Issues: * The scheduler configuration using `scx_beerland` appears to have significantly lower performance, approximately 6% lower in average FPS compared to others. It also has about 55% higher FPS variability than the best-performing run, which could lead to less consistent gameplay. * The GPU load with `scx_bpfland` is notably higher by about 7% compared to others, suggesting higher resource consumption which could impact power efficiency or temperature management. # Summary The benchmark of the game "Nine Sols" using `scx` schedulers on a consistent hardware setup aimed to assess performance variability and efficiency under different scheduling strategies. While all tests were conducted using the same `Linux kernel` version and `performance` governor, the `scx_bpfland -w` scheduler outperformed others with superior FPS and smoothness, making it the optimal choice. Meanwhile, `scx_beerland` showed underperformance in both FPS and frame consistency metrics, indicating room for improvement or unsuitability in high-stakes gaming scenarios. Overall, scheduler `performance and stability remain vital in determining the best gameplay experience.