# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `scx_cosmos -m all -c 0 -p 0 | 2` with approximately 1% higher average FPS compared to other runs. * **Smoothest FPS**: `scx_bpfland -w | 3` with the lowest standard deviation, indicating more consistent frame pacing. * **Best overall**: `scx_cosmos -m all -c 0 -p 0 | 2` due to a balance between high FPS and reasonable consistency in frame pacing. # Issues: * The run with **`scx_cosmos`** consistently shows approximately 0.5% higher average FPS than **`scx_bpfland`**, resulting in a slightly better performance profile. # Summary The benchmark compares two different `scx` schedulers in a GPU-limited environment under similar hardware and software setups. The `scx_cosmos` variants demonstrated a better average FPS performance across three runs while maintaining stability, leading to a marginally overall superior performance profile compared to the `scx_bpfland` variants, which had a lower variance in frame pacing but slightly lower FPS. The choice of scheduler slightly influences the FPS but does not significantly affect the temperature or power metrics, indicating efficiency in handling GPU resources.