# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `Next 1` with slightly higher average FPS compared to others. * **Smoothest FPS**: `Main 1` with the lowest standard deviation and variance of FPS among the runs. * **Best overall**: `Main 1`, offering a balance of high performance and smoothness, as it is significantly more stable than others with only marginally lower FPS. # Issues: * `Next 2` exhibits a significantly higher variance in FPS, indicating noticeable instability in comparison to the other configurations. The high variability is not in line with the consistent performance of other runs. # Summary In this benchmark comparing `bpfland` and `bpfland-next` schedulers in an environment running a 1080p60 Discord stream with an AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE paired with an AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D, the `Main` configuration appears to deliver better overall stability, particularly when analyzing the frame time consistency. Meanwhile, the `bpfland-next` scheduler, although achieving slightly higher FPS, suffers from greater variability, especially under the configuration involving `Next 2`. The data suggests that while `bpfland-next` can perform well in terms of raw frame output, its stability requires improvement for consistent, high-quality performance in such scenarios.