### Top runs - **Highest FPS**: `BORE epp performance` with around 20% higher mean FPS compared to the second-highest. - **Smoothest FPS**: `Bpfland-next epp performance` with approximately 5% lower standard deviation in FPS compared to the next best run. - **Best overall**: `Rusty epp performance`, offering a balanced mix of high FPS (roughly 10% lower than the top) and consistent performance (standard deviation around 5% higher than the smoothest FPS). ### Issues - The `ASDF epp performance` run has mean FPS around 18% lower than the second-lowest, with other parameters like `Linux kernel`, `GPU`, and `CPU` being consistent among all benchmark runs. This discrepancy suggests an issue with the run itself. ### Summary The benchmark dataset contains six runs across identical hardware and software configurations. Among these, `BORE epp performance` leads in FPS but exhibits higher variability, while `Bpfland-next epp performance` excels in FPS consistency. The `Rusty epp performance` offers the best overall performance with a solid blend of both high FPS and stability. The `ASDF epp performance` run shows significantly lower FPS, which appears to be an anomaly, as the hardware and software were consistent across all runs.