Benchmark #295

Download
Rocket League new Schedutil patches test

Rocket League first two minutes of match replay no additional workload Ryzen 5700X RTX 3060Ti

Submitted 10 months ago by yubysowhat

Specifications
Label OS GPU CPU RAM OS specific
EPP performance BORE CachyOS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 5700X 8-Core Processor 17 GB 6.11.0-rc4-2-cachyos-rc performance
EPP performance Rusty CachyOS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 5700X 8-Core Processor 17 GB 6.11.0-rc4-2-cachyos-rc performance
Guided schedutil BORE CachyOS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 5700X 8-Core Processor 17 GB 6.11.0-rc4-2-cachyos-rc schedutil
Guided schedutil Rusty CachyOS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 5700X 8-Core Processor 17 GB 6.11.0-rc4-2-cachyos-rc schedutil
# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `EPP performance BORE` with the highest average FPS, which is approximately 1% higher than other runs. * **Smoothest FPS**: `Guided schedutil Rusty` has the lowest standard deviation and variance in FPS. * **Best overall**: `EPP performance BORE` combines the highest FPS with good stability, making it the best overall choice. # Issues: * The `Guided schedutil BORE` run shows approximately 2-4% lower average FPS compared to other configurations. Given similar hardware and benchmarks, this could suggest a performance drawback of using `schedutil` in this context. # Summary This Rocket League benchmark test compares the performance impact of new `schedutil` patches versus a performance-centric scheduler. Using consistent high-end hardware and software (Ryzen 5700X, RTX 3060 Ti, CachyOS, performance or `schedutil` schedulers), the tests reveal that the performance-oriented scheduler configuration consistently delivers higher FPS. The `schedutil` configuration underperforms by approximately 2-4% FPS, highlighting a potential area for improvement in schedutil's scheduling strategy for this workload. While the `EPP performance BORE` configuration provides the highest FPS, the `Guided schedutil Rusty` run achieves the smoothest FPS, indicating varying strengths between the configurations.