Benchmark #295

Download
Rocket League new Schedutil patches test

Rocket League first two minutes of match replay no additional workload Ryzen 5700X RTX 3060Ti

Submitted 4 weeks ago by yubysowhat

Specifications
Label OS GPU CPU RAM OS specific
EPP performance BORE CachyOS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 5700X 8-Core Processor 17 GB 6.11.0-rc4-2-cachyos-rc performance
EPP performance Rusty CachyOS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 5700X 8-Core Processor 17 GB 6.11.0-rc4-2-cachyos-rc performance
Guided schedutil BORE CachyOS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 5700X 8-Core Processor 17 GB 6.11.0-rc4-2-cachyos-rc schedutil
Guided schedutil Rusty CachyOS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 5700X 8-Core Processor 17 GB 6.11.0-rc4-2-cachyos-rc schedutil
# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `EPP performance BORE` with the highest average FPS, which is approximately 1% higher than other runs. * **Smoothest FPS**: `Guided schedutil Rusty` has the lowest standard deviation and variance in FPS. * **Best overall**: `EPP performance BORE` combines the highest FPS with good stability, making it the best overall choice. # Issues: * The `Guided schedutil BORE` run shows approximately 2-4% lower average FPS compared to other configurations. Given similar hardware and benchmarks, this could suggest a performance drawback of using `schedutil` in this context. # Summary This Rocket League benchmark test compares the performance impact of new `schedutil` patches versus a performance-centric scheduler. Using consistent high-end hardware and software (Ryzen 5700X, RTX 3060 Ti, CachyOS, performance or `schedutil` schedulers), the tests reveal that the performance-oriented scheduler configuration consistently delivers higher FPS. The `schedutil` configuration underperforms by approximately 2-4% FPS, highlighting a potential area for improvement in schedutil's scheduling strategy for this workload. While the `EPP performance BORE` configuration provides the highest FPS, the `Guided schedutil Rusty` run achieves the smoothest FPS, indicating varying strengths between the configurations.