Benchmark #37

Download
Mirror's Edge: bpfland-next, c8d6efa, various --slice-us values, under stress -c $((3 * $(nproc)))

Tested bpfland from bpfland-next branch, commit ID c8d6efa, under stress -c $((3 * $(nproc)))

Submitted 2 months ago by erikas2

Specifications
Label OS GPU CPU RAM OS specific
5000 Arch Linux AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE (RADV NAVI31) AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core Processor 34 GB 6.9.8-2-cachyos-lto performance
10000 Arch Linux AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE (RADV NAVI31) AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core Processor 34 GB 6.9.8-2-cachyos-lto performance
15000 Arch Linux AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE (RADV NAVI31) AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core Processor 34 GB 6.9.8-2-cachyos-lto performance
20000 Arch Linux AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE (RADV NAVI31) AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core Processor 34 GB 6.9.8-2-cachyos-lto performance
25000 Arch Linux AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE (RADV NAVI31) AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core Processor 34 GB 6.9.8-2-cachyos-lto performance
30000 Arch Linux AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE (RADV NAVI31) AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core Processor 34 GB 6.9.8-2-cachyos-lto performance
35000 Arch Linux AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE (RADV NAVI31) AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core Processor 34 GB 6.9.8-2-cachyos-lto performance
40000 Arch Linux AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE (RADV NAVI31) AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core Processor 34 GB 6.9.8-2-cachyos-lto performance
45000 Arch Linux AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE (RADV NAVI31) AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core Processor 34 GB 6.9.8-2-cachyos-lto performance
50000 Arch Linux AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE (RADV NAVI31) AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core Processor 34 GB 6.9.8-2-cachyos-lto performance
## Top runs - `Best overall`: Run labeled `10000` with the highest Mean FPS and relatively low StdDev compared to most other runs. - `Highest FPS`: Run labeled `5000` with the highest Mean FPS, approximately 1.6% higher than the next best run. - `Smoothest FPS`: Run labeled `15000` with the smallest FPS StdDev, making it roughly 2.6% more stable than the next best run. ## Issues - Run labeled `40000` has Mean FPS approximately 2.5% lower than the average for the other runs. Given the consistent hardware and software setup, this significant drop in FPS can be highlighted as an issue. ## Summary All runs were conducted on the same hardware and software setup, ensuring consistency. The runs labeled `5000` and `10000` stand out with high FPS, while `15000` is the smoothest in terms of FPS stability. A significant issue is observed with run `40000`, having approximately 2.5% lower Mean FPS than other runs, which hints at a possible problem with this specific run and not a general hardware or software issue. Overall, the rest of the runs show minor differences, with some prioritizing FPS over stability and vice versa.