Benchmark #38

Download
Mirror's Edge: bpfland comparison of bpfland-next-9141da8 vs main-fc0d1bd, idle system

bpfland-next-9141da8 vs main-fc0d1bd on idle system

Submitted 2 months ago by erikas2

Specifications
Label OS GPU CPU RAM OS specific
bpfland-next-9141da8 Arch Linux AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE (RADV NAVI31) AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core Processor 34 GB 6.9.8-2-cachyos-lto performance
main-fc0d1bd Arch Linux AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE (RADV NAVI31) AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core Processor 34 GB 6.9.8-2-cachyos-lto performance
### Top runs - **Highest FPS**: Run labeled `main-fc0d1bd` has the highest average FPS. - **Smoothest FPS**: Run labeled `bpfland-next-9141da8` has the smoothest FPS, showcasing the lowest standard deviation and variance. - **Best Overall**: Run labeled `bpfland-next-9141da8` is the best overall due to a balance of high FPS and smoother performance. ### Issues - **Run `bpfland-next-9141da8`**: FPS is significantly lower compared to `main-fc0d1bd`, indicating that the system may not be optimized. The discrepancy is significant, with `main-fc0d1bd` achieving substantially higher FPS values while being on the same hardware and software environment. ### Summary The benchmark comparison between `bpfland-next-9141da8` and `main-fc0d1bd` shows a distinct difference in performance. `main-fc0d1bd` delivers substantially higher FPS but suffers from greater variability in frame rates, indicated by a higher standard deviation. In contrast, `bpfland-next-9141da8` offers smoother performance despite significantly lower FPS. Given identical hardware and software configurations, the `bpfland-next-9141da8` run appears to be less optimized, which could explain the lower FPS. Overall, while `main-fc0d1bd` excels in raw performance, `bpfland-next-9141da8` provides a more stable gaming experience.