## Top runs - `scx_bpfland` has the "Highest FPS" with a mean FPS that is over 200% higher than the other runs. - `scx_bpfland` also has the "Smoothest FPS" with a standard deviation and variance more than 900% lower than the other runs. - The "Best overall" run is `scx_bpfland`, combining the highest and smoothest FPS. ## Issues - `BORE` has significantly worse performance with an average FPS more than 400% lower than both other runs, indicating a substantial issue in the benchmark. - Despite using the same hardware and software settings, `BORE` showed extremely high variance and standard deviation in FPS, indicating unstable performance. ## Summary The benchmark results show that `scx_bpfland` outperforms the other two runs significantly in both FPS and stability. `scx_rusty` fares better than `BORE`, but still shows a significant FPS decrease compared to `scx_bpfland` and higher frame time variability. The `BORE` run underperformed significantly, indicating an issue with its setup or efficiency under the given conditions. Overall, while `scx_bpfland` is the best in both FPS and stability, `BORE` needs further investigation to understand its substantial performance issues.