# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `bpfland-next-9141da8` with an average FPS approximately 22% higher than the other run. This indicates it can deliver much smoother gaming experience in terms of frame updates. * **Smoothest FPS**: `main-fc0d1bd` since it exhibits a lower standard deviation and variance in the FPS, approximately 16% less variation compared to the other run, leading to a more consistent gameplay. * **Best overall**: `bpfland-next-9141da8` because it offers not only the highest average FPS but also maintains acceptable smoothness, making it a balanced choice for performance and stability. # Issues: * The configuration involving `main-fc0d1bd` has significantly lower FPS values, approximately 18% less on average, potentially affecting game fluidity especially in high-action sequences. This configuration also showed higher frame time variations (~33% higher standard deviation), which can result in noticeable stutter during gameplay. # Summary In this benchmark between `bpfland-next-9141da8` and `main-fc0d1bd`, both with background stress tests and similar hardware and software configurations, `bpfland-next-9141da8` emerges as the superior option. It not only achieves the highest average FPS but also maintains an acceptable level of smoothness, making it ideal for high-performance gaming. On the other hand, `main-fc0d1bd` lags behind with significantly lower FPS and higher frame time variability, which could negatively impact the gaming experience.