# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `bore` with approximately 0.3% higher average FPS compared to the next best run. This marginally higher frame rate indicates a slightly better maximum performance. * **Smoothest FPS**: `bpfland_lowlatency`, showing approximately 3% lower std. deviation, leading to more consistent frame delivery and smoother gameplay experience. * **Best overall**: `bore`, considering its highest FPS performance with a slight compromise in smoothness compared to `bpfland_lowlatency`. # Issues: * The configuration using `lavd_autopilot` reported approximately 5% higher CPU temperatures compared to the other configurations. * `lavd_autopilot` also exhibited around 7% lower GPU temperatures while having almost the same FPS output, indicating potential underutilization of GPU resources. # Summary In the Forza Horizon 5 benchmark comparing the `lakevan-dam` (`lavd`) scheduler in autopilot mode with the `bpfland` scheduler in low-latency mode and the bore configuration, all configurations used the same hardware setup but displayed slight variations in performance. The `bore` configuration achieved the highest overall average FPS, making it the top choice for maximum frame rates, albeit with marginally higher variability. Conversely, the `bpfland` configuration boasted the smoothest FPS distribution, suggesting a more stable gaming experience. Notably, the `lavd` configuration showed differences in CPU and GPU temperatures, which may indicate suboptimal utilization of the GPU despite comparable FPS to others.