# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `BORE performance` with a Mean FPS significantly higher than others, indicating the best frame rate. * **Smoothest FPS**: `Bpfland performance` with the lowest Std. Dev. and Variance in FPS, indicating the smoothest gaming experience. * **Best overall**: `BORE performance` despite having a slightly higher Std. Dev., the significant increase in Mean FPS makes it the best overall choice. # Issues: * One run shows a notably lower Mean FPS compared to others. * The configuration for all runs is identical; therefore, the differences in FPS are likely tied to scheduler performance only. * Lower overall and more variable FPS in the `LAVD` run compared to the others, having both the lowest Mean FPS and the highest FPS Variance. # Summary This benchmark compares the performance of different Linux schedulers (`powersave`, `bpfland`, `lavd`, and `rusty`) on CachyOS using a Ryzen 5700X CPU and an RTX 3060 Ti GPU, focusing on FPS and frametime while replaying the first two minutes of a Rocket League match. Notably, the scheduler in the `BORE performance` run delivered the highest Mean FPS, while the `bpfland` scheduler provided the most consistent and smooth FPS. The `lavd` scheduler run exhibited the lowest performance with the highest FPS variance, suggesting less stability. Comparing these results provides valuable insights into how different Linux schedulers can impact gaming performance and system stability in a controlled environment.