# Top runs - **Highest FPS**: `BORE` has the highest average FPS, outperforming the other runs by several percent. - **Smoothest FPS**: `BORE` offers the smoothest experience with the lowest standard deviation and variance in FPS. - **Best overall**: `BORE` is the best overall, balancing both high FPS and smooth performance with minimal variability. # Issues - **bpfland-next-0bfc9ff**: This run has the lowest FPS among the runs, performing approximately 35% worse in the lowest FPS metric compared to `BORE`. Despite running on the same hardware and software configurations, its performance issue is notable as it fails to deliver consistent gaming experience compared to `BORE` and `scx_rusty`. # Summary In this benchmark, three runs (`BORE`, `bpfland-next-0bfc9ff`, and `scx_rusty`) were compared using identical hardware and software configurations. `BORE` emerged as the top performer, leading in both highest and smoothest FPS categories. `scx_rusty` provided competitive performance but fell slightly short in both FPS average and stability. On the other hand, `bpfland-next-0bfc9ff` showed significant issues with lower FPS and higher variability, which is concerning given the identical test conditions. Overall, `BORE` stands out for its combination of high performance and stability.