# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `BORE 5.2.11` as it achieves the highest average FPS compared to others. * **Smoothest FPS**: `BORE 5.3.0RC3` with the lowest standard deviation and variance in FPS, indicating more stable and smooth frame delivery. * **Best overall**: `BORE 5.3.0RC3` as it combines smooth performance with competitive FPS, ranking top in stability with only slightly lower FPS than the best average. # Issues: * The run with EEVDF-next has approximately 2% lower FPS and increased variance indicating worse FPS stability compared to others. * Despite EEVDF runs using the same hardware and operating system, EEVDF-next has a notable outlier in swap usage, leading to higher variability in FPS. # Summary The benchmark evaluates different Linux kernel versions involving the `EEVDF` and `BORE` schedulers using a consistent hardware setup, namely Ryzen 5700X and RTX 3060 Ti, on `CachyOS` with `powersave` mode. `BORE 5.3.0RC3` delivers superior performance in terms of FPS stability, while `BORE 5.2.11` achieves the highest average FPS. However, EEVDF-next exhibits lower FPS and higher variance due to increased swap usage, highlighting possible inefficiencies with this kernel's configuration in maintaining frame rate consistency under the test conditions.