# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `BMQ performance` and it delivers the highest average frames per second. * **Smoothest FPS**: `BMQ performance` and it shows the lowest standard deviation in FPS, indicating the most consistent frame delivery. * **Best overall**: `BMQ performance` due to a combination of the highest FPS and the smoothest performance among all tests. # Issues: * The variation comparing mean FPS in the `LAVD` run is significantly lower than others, indicating a notable performance drop. * Unlike others, `Bpfland` and `LAVD` also show a much higher variance in FPS, indicating inconsistent performance. * `BORE 5.2.12 performance` uses a different Linux kernel than the rest, which could account for performance discrepancies. # Summary The benchmarks compare different schedulers within the `CachyOS` environment, running on the same hardware setup. The `powersave` scheduler under different configurations delivers varied performance results. Among these, the `BMQ` configuration under the `powersave` scheduler stands out with the highest FPS and smoothest performance, suggesting a better optimization or combination of components at play. However, configurations such as `Bpfland` and `LAVD` show considerably reduced and inconsistent performance, hinting at potential mismatches or inefficiencies that detract from their overall execution. The kernel variations, such as in the `BORE 5.2.12`, may also contribute to performance diversity across these tests.