## Top runs - **Highest FPS**: `mesa-git` with 2.5% higher average FPS than `mesa`. - **Smoothest FPS**: `mesa` with 3.4% lower standard deviation of FPS compared to `mesa-git`. - **Best overall**: `mesa-git`, combines a slight decrease in stability (3.4% higher standard deviation of FPS) for a significantly higher FPS (2.5% higher average FPS). ## Summary Both benchmarks used the same hardware and software configurations. `mesa-git` achieved a 2.5% higher average FPS but with a 3.4% higher standard deviation in comparison to `mesa`, indicating a small trade-off between FPS and stability. The CPU load and temperatures were relatively similar, though `mesa-git` showed a slightly higher average load and temperature. GPU load and memory clock were nearly identical across both runs, but `mesa-git` exhibited a notably lower GPU core clock variance, indicating more consistent GPU performance. There are no significant issues, thus both benchmarks are reliable with `mesa-git` being the preferred choice for higher FPS and `mesa` for smoother performance.