Benchmark #553

Download
BORE 5.6.0 vs SCX schedulers in Rocket League kernel 6.12

Rocket League first two minutes of match replay no additional workload Ryzen 5700X RTX 3060Ti EPP powersave / balance_performance

Submitted 1 month ago by yubysowhat

Specifications
Label OS GPU CPU RAM OS specific
BORE 5.6.0 Kernel 6.12 CachyOS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 5700X 8-Core Processor 17 GB 6.12.0-rc1-2612BORE powersave
Bpfland Kernel 6.12 CachyOS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 5700X 8-Core Processor 17 GB 6.12.0-rc1-2612BORE powersave
LAVD Kernel 6.12 CachyOS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 5700X 8-Core Processor 17 GB 6.12.0-rc1-2612BORE powersave
Rusty Kernel 6.12 CachyOS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 5700X 8-Core Processor 17 GB 6.12.0-rc1-2612BORE powersave
# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `BORE 5.6.0 Kernel 6.12` delivers the highest average FPS, offering superior performance compared to other schedulers. * **Smoothest FPS**: `Bpfland Kernel 6.12` provides the smoothest gaming experience with the lowest FPS variance and standard deviation. * **Best overall**: `Bpfland Kernel 6.12` offers a balanced combination of high and stable FPS, making it the best overall option. # Issues: * The configuration running with a specific Linux scheduler shows significantly lower average FPS and higher frame time variance compared to others. This is a noticeable drop in performance, indicating an optimization or compatibility issue with the said scheduler. # Summary This benchmark compares the efficiency of different schedulers using `Linux kernel 6.12` in conjunction with `BORE 5.6.0`. Tested on a `Ryzen 5700X` and `RTX 3060Ti`, all configurations maintained similar hardware and software setups. The `BORE` scheduler achieved the highest average FPS, showcasing its prowess in performance-focused scenarios. Meanwhile, the `Bpfland` scheduler stood out by maintaining a balance between high performance and smooth gameplay, due to its low FPS deviation and variance values. One particular scheduler lagged significantly in FPS performance, pointing towards potential optimization needs or compatibility issues under the same test conditions.