# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `BORE 5.7.1` with an approximately 2% higher mean FPS than the other runs. * **Smoothest FPS**: `Bpfland` showing 3% lower variance and standard deviation, indicating more consistent performance. * **Best overall**: `BORE 5.7.1` offers both the highest FPS and competitive stability with a variance only about 6% higher than the smoothest, striking a strong balance between raw performance and stability. # Issues: * The run using the `LAVD` scheduler has approximately a 3% lower mean FPS compared to others, coupled with noticeably higher variance and standard deviation, making it less stable. * Additionally, both the GPU load and mean GPU temp in the `LAVD` scheduler run were around 2-3% lower than other runs, possibly indicating underutilization. # Summary This benchmark evaluated Rocket League performance using different schedulers on `CachyOS` with the same hardware specifications, focusing primarily on the `BORE` scheduler versus implementations under `sched_ext`, including `Bpfland`, `Fair`, `LAVD`, and `Rusty`. The `BORE` scheduler showcased the highest average FPS, maintaining an optimal balance between raw performance and stability. On the other hand, the `Bpfland` scheduler proved to be the most stable, with minimal frame time fluctuation. The `LAVD` scheduler displayed noticeably lower performance in terms of FPS and consistency, which might be linked to sub-optimal resource utilization. Overall, these results highlight the impact of scheduler choice on gaming performance, emphasizing the trade-offs between high FPS and smooth gameplay experience.