# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `Bore Run 2` has the highest average FPS, which is about 1% higher than other runs, indicating strong performance. * **Smoothest FPS**: `BMQ Run 1` offers the smoothest FPS with the lowest standard deviation, showing consistent performance. * **Best overall**: `Bore Run 2` provides a good balance of high FPS and stability, slightly sacrificing smoothness for a significant increase in performance. # Issues: * The BORE GCC runs have lower FPS averages compared to others, showing around 1% less FPS than the alternatives in the Bore and BMQ configurations. * The CPU temperature in the BORE settings is slightly higher, around 4% compared to other configurations, indicating increased CPU stress. # Summary This benchmark compared different implementations of the BMQ and BORE Linux kernel scheduler using a balanced power profile on a system with a Ryzen 5700X CPU and an RTX 3060Ti GPU. The runs utilizing the BMQ kernel provided smoother FPS stability than others, while the BORE configurations, particularly in the `Bore Run 2`, provided the highest FPS. The BORE GCC runs exhibited slightly less FPS and faced higher CPU temperatures, indicating they might not be as efficient under these conditions. These insights suggest that while BMQ may offer smoother frame delivery, BORE may achieve higher peak performance, useful for scenarios where maximum FPS is desired.