Benchmark #808

Download
BORE 5.7.10 vs BORE 5.8.10 vs SCX schedulers in Rocket League | Kernel 6.12.2

Rocket League | first two minutes of match replay | no additional workload | Ryzen 5700X | RTX 3060Ti | power profile: Balanced | kernel 6.12.2

Submitted 4 months ago by yubysowhat

Specifications
Label OS GPU CPU RAM OS specific
BORE 5.7.10 CachyOS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 5700X 8-Core Processor 17 GB 6.12.2-1B5710 powersave
BORE 5.8.10 CachyOS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 5700X 8-Core Processor 17 GB 6.12.2-1B5810 powersave
Bpfland CachyOS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 5700X 8-Core Processor 17 GB 6.12.2-1B5810 powersave
Bpfland-next CachyOS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 5700X 8-Core Processor 17 GB 6.12.2-1B5810 powersave
Flash CachyOS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 5700X 8-Core Processor 17 GB 6.12.2-1B5810 powersave
LAVD CachyOS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 5700X 8-Core Processor 17 GB 6.12.2-1B5810 powersave
Rusty CachyOS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 5700X 8-Core Processor 17 GB 6.12.2-1B5810 powersave
# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `BORE 5.8.10` with roughly 2% higher mean FPS compared to others. * **Smoothest FPS**: `BORE 5.8.10` with about 5% lower standard deviation than the rest. * **Best overall**: `BORE 5.8.10`, offering both the highest FPS and smooth, stable performance, proving to be the best overall choice in this benchmark. # Issues: * One of the examined schedulers performed significantly lower, with around 7% drop in FPS compared to others. * The configuration for all runs is consistent, focusing on different versions of BORE and available scheduling implementations. # Summary The benchmark is a comprehensive evaluation of `BORE` versions 5.7.10 and 5.8.10 with comparisons to various schedulers on a `Ryzen 5700X` and `RTX 3060Ti`, running on `CachyOS`. The `BORE 5.8.10` run excelled with its higher FPS and smoother performance, making it the top performer. In contrast, some scheduling implementations displayed significant performance drops, indicating the impact of different scheduling strategies on performance consistency. This suggests that while `BORE` advancements show positive improvements, some schedulers still need optimization to better support demanding gaming scenarios in a `Linux kernel 6.12.2` environment.