Benchmark #853

Download
BORE vs SCX schedulers in Rocket League | Kernel 6.12.6 | New Map

Rocket League | first two minutes of match replay | no additional workload | Ryzen 5700X | RTX 3060Ti | power profile: Balanced

Submitted 3 weeks ago by yubysowhat

Specifications
Label OS GPU CPU RAM OS specific
BORE CachyOS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 5700X 8-Core Processor 17 GB 6.12.6-2-cachyos powersave
Bpfland CachyOS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 5700X 8-Core Processor 17 GB 6.12.6-2-cachyos powersave
Bpfland-next CachyOS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 5700X 8-Core Processor 17 GB 6.12.6-2-cachyos powersave
Bpfland-testing CachyOS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 5700X 8-Core Processor 17 GB 6.12.6-2-cachyos powersave
Flash CachyOS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 5700X 8-Core Processor 17 GB 6.12.6-2-cachyos powersave
LAVD CachyOS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 5700X 8-Core Processor 17 GB 6.12.6-2-cachyos powersave
Rusty CachyOS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 5700X 8-Core Processor 17 GB 6.12.6-2-cachyos powersave
# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `BORE` has the highest average FPS, outperforming the other tested configurations. * **Smoothest FPS**: `Bpfland-testing` delivers the smoothest FPS experience with the lowest standard deviation. * **Best overall**: `BORE` offers a good balance with the highest FPS and competitive smoothness compared to other configurations. # Issues: * The configuration using `Bpfland` and `Rusty` schedulers showed significant performance drawbacks. Despite having the same hardware and software setup, their FPS was substantially lower compared to the other runs. # Summary The benchmark compared the performance of different schedulers, specifically `BORE` and multiple variations of `SCX` schedulers in the context of Rocket League. On a balanced power profile with a Ryzen 5700X and a RTX 3060Ti, the `BORE` scheduler significantly outperformed the others in terms of average FPS, making it the most effective in this test. Additionally, `Bpfland-testing` demonstrated the smoothest performance with the least FPS variance among the alternative schedulers tested. Test results were obtained under the same kernel and cache-efficient OS, using identical hardware configurations, allowing for a fair comparison of scheduler efficiency without external factors influencing the results.